It’s hard to compete with the real-life drama coming out of
Washington D.C. these days, but Joe Chappelle’s An Acceptable Loss attempts to do just that with this
thought-provoking political thriller in which decisions made with the noblest
of intentions still help pave the road to hell.
Former top U.S. security adviser Elizabeth "Libby"
Lamm (Tika Sumpter) is a woman haunted by just such a decision—one made during
her tenure working for and at the bequest of then-Vice President Rachel Burke
(Jamie Lee Curtis). As draftswoman of a plan that led to America dropping a
nuclear bomb on a Syrian city that resulted in mass causalities numbering in
the tens of thousands, Libby knows that parts of an influential report that led
to the aerial strike against a suspected terrorist stronghold were falsified. And,
although she initially fulfills her role as a dutiful soldier by helping Burke
convince the American public of the legality of the administration’s actions,
her conscience is getting the best of her as the full ramifications of her
decision play out in the ensuing five-year period. Reduced to a moral and
political pariah, Libby takes a teaching position at a Chicago
university where her very presence is protested by students and some
faculty alike despite the support she receives from the kindly Dr. Willa Sipe
(THE VISIT’s Deanna Dunagan). In a scene-stealing cameo, SEX AND THE CITY’s David
Eigenberg—here as an unnamed drunken colleague—confronts Libby at a faculty
mixer, demanding to know how many innocents she helped murder. It’s no surprise
then when a guilt-ridden Libby starts scribbling down a full account of what
went down leading up to execution of the Burke Doctrine on yellow legal pads in
anticipation of owning up and coming clean. The convenient fact that her father
(the always-solid character actor Clarke Peters) is a prominent newspaper editor
seems like the logical means to do so.
But—like all good political thrillers—there are
complications. Libby’s take the form of a sullen graduate student named Martin
(Ben Tavassoli) who’s stalking her for reasons that are as apparent as his
obvious national origin and her old boss, who’s now gearing up for a run to
become a second term President. Thrown into the mix is Adrian (Jeff Hephner), Burke's
ruthless chief of staff and Libby’s former lover, who makes it clear during his
own surveillance activities that Libby is either with them or against them. Cue
ominous music.
Marketing tags are everything, and An Acceptable Loss—as political thriller—will
come up short for some since two-thirds of the film is decidedly more political
drama, a key distinction. In fact—although
Chappelle (who also penned the script) ably ups the thriller quotient in the
film’s third act with twists and turns that deliver a strong one-two punch—it’s
what precedes the action-packed finale that provides both the film’s strongest
asset and biggest missed opportunity: The relationship between Libby and Burke.
Indeed, the best moments in the film come via flashbacks between Sumpter and Curtis’s
characters—an escalation of the power dynamic between a woman in power who’s
seeking more and a woman just beginning to ascend the ranks who sees the real
possibilities ahead of her. At first, Burke makes a passionate, hardline case
for what she wants to do to the reluctant Libby, attempting to justify the
collateral damage by appealing to the younger woman’s sense of “for the greater
good” and patriotism; later, we see Burke’s steely resolve as she manipulates Libby
using guilt and fear to bring her around. These are magnificent scenes—especially
for Curtis—in which the power dynamic between educated women in positions of
authority and influence is explored. Unfortunately
for An Acceptable Loss, these scenes
and that driving dynamic are relegated to these expository sidebars when they
had, in fact, the potential to drive the entire film into interesting and far
more dramatic territory.
Sumpter, although appealing as an actor, seems miscast here.
At first I thought it was an age thing—that she might have been too young to be
playing a seasoned political advisor—but the actress is actually approaching
forty, just the right age for the character and her level of accomplishment. Tavassoli,
as Martin, is engrossing despite not being given much to do through two-thirds
of the film but skulk around Libby’s empty house and act creepy. When he is
given something meaningful to do, he ably rises to the occasion. Curtis is the
crown jewel of the ensemble and the best part of An Acceptable Loss, taking what could have been a one-note villain
role and layering her character’s outward fierce determination and ambition
with a tragic sense of misguided nobility and, later in the film, even a note of remorse. It’s
interesting that while Christian Bale is garnering accolades for his portrayal
of Dick Cheney in another film, Curtis may embody the former VP’s hawkish
calculations and puppet-master political persona even better here.
Curtis has entered an interesting phase of her career where
her maturity grounds her performances in a captivating gravitas, elevating her dramatic
chops into the provinces of the Frances McDormands and Glenn Closes of the acting
world. Her chilling portrayal of a politico hell-bent on seeing her vision
through at all costs—her reasoning for changing U.S. policy regarding first-strike
attacks alone should resonate against the backdrop of today’s geopolitics—is easily
one of the best performances of her career. Yes, we know she’s a veteran scream
queen and an accomplished comedienne; but let’s hope that the roles coming her
way in her own third act take full advantage of this newly-engaged aptitude for
drama.
Watching An Acceptable
Loss, one can easily lament Chappelle’s misdirection in opting for straight-forward
political intrigue over a nuanced character study of two powerful women—one in
a position of authority, the other in a position of influence—and how the subtleties
of this power dynamic impact and affect the world around them, but Curtis’s first-rate
performance should make that bitter pill easier to swallow. Come for Curtis,
stay for Curtis, and be surprised by the third-act tricks Chappelle’s got up
his sleeve.
Thanks for the review, Vince. I haven't yet seen the film, but your review certainly whets my appetite.
ReplyDelete